Home / Resources & Contact

Resources & Contact

Contact

TechGen4Health integrates experts in the research field of endoparasite infections and the evaluation of grazing systems in cattle from 7 European countries. Each of the objectives described above is led by a working group with relevant scientific experience, supported by a respective associated partner organisation from the “practical world”. Afterwards, in WP8, all these methods and technologies are brought together. Therefore, the consortium consists of the project coordinator Prof. S. König (UGI), who is supported by Dr I. Giambra (UGI), and the project partners Prof. N. Gengler (ULiège), Prof. S. Thamsborg, (UCPH), Prof. B. Aernouts (KUL), Dr. T. Zanon (UBO), Prof. M. Klopčič (UL), Dr. I. van Dixhoorn (WLR), and Dr. A. Šiukščius (LSMU).

Composition of the consortium TechGen4Health

PartnerHeadResearch institute
P1Prof. Dr. Sven KönigJustus-Liebig-University Giessen, Germany (JLU)
P2Prof. Dr. Nicolas GenglerUniversité de Liège, GxABT-TERRA, Belgium (ULiège)
P3Prof. Dr. Stig M. ThamsborgUniversity of Copenhagen, Denmark (UCPH)
P4Prof. Dr. Ben AernoutsKU Leuven Biosystems, Belgium (KUL)
P5Dr. Thomas ZanonFree University of Bolzano, Italy (UBO)
P6Prof. Dr. Marija KlopčičUniversity of Ljubljana, Slovenia (UL)
P7Dr. Ingrid van DixhoornWageningen University and Research, The Netherlands (WLR)
P8Dr. Artūras ŠiukščiusLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Lithuania (LSMU)

In addition to the eight project partners, the following eight associated partners are involved in TechGen4Health: CRA-W, Elevéo, EUROFINS, FBF, Kreavet, PIENO TYRIMAI, SEGES Innovation and the Slovenian Holstein Association.

Associated partners involved in TechGen4Health

PartnerInstitutionCountryMain field
P9Förderverein BioökonomieforschungGermanyData transfer from German dairy farms, validation, and economic evaluation
P10ElevéoBelgiumMilk performance testing, genetic evaluations
P11Walloon Agricultural Research CentreBelgiumInfrared spectrometry of milk and faeces
P12KreavetBelgiumVeterinary parasitology, epidemiology and socio-economics of animal health
P13SEGES InnovationDenmarkFarm selection and farm data provision
P14Eurofins Milk Testing, DenmarkDenmarkMilk control data and provision of bulk tank milk samples
P15Slovenian Holstein AssociationSloveniaGenomic analyses and validation and economic evaluation
P16JSC Pieno tyrimaiLithuaniaTesting of milk composition and quality during milk recording

All partners and their respective analyses are closely networked (see work packages descriptions), as e.g., the WP4 lab method is used across all partners to assess the endoparasitic load of faeces. These cross-national faecal sample analyses provide a comprehensive data basis that all partner countries can use to validate their new methods and technologies. Furthermore, these new methods and technologies will be extended to the partner countries once they have been established. All partners will exchange data with each other.

National Funding Agencies

The National Funding Agencies are:

PartnerNational Funding Agency
UGIThe Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Regional Identity (BMLEH)
ULiègeFederal Public Service Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment (FPS Health)
UCPHInnovation Fund Denmark (IFD)
KULThe Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO)
UBOMinistry of agriculture, food sovereignty and forestry (MASF)
ULMinistrstvo za kmetijstvo, gozdarstvo in prehrano (MKGP)
WLRMinisterie van Landbouw, Visserij, Voedselzekerheid en Natuur (LVVN)
LSMULietuvos mokslo taryba (LMT)

Resources

Data management platform

Additionally, WP9 focusses on the project organisation, communication and the establishment of a data management platform. Regular video conferences and project meetings will be established to discuss project progresses, interim results and problems in detail. In addition, LSMU and JLU have created this centralised TechGen4Health homepage. A data management platform is also being established, where data from all partners will be stored centrally and made available to all participating scientists and associated partners.

References

  • Ali, I., Cawkwell, F., Dwyer, E., Barrett, B., Green, S. (2016): Satellite remote sensing of grasslands: from observation to management. J. Plant Ecol. 9: 649–671. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtw005
  • Armbrecht, L., Lambertz, C., Albers, D., Gauly, M. (2019): Assessment of welfare indicators in dairy farms offering pasture at differing levels. Animal 13: 2336–2347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119000570
  • Galama,P. J., Ouweltjes, W., Endres, M. I., Sprecher, J. R., Leso, L., Kuipers, A., Klopčič, M. (2020): Symposium review: Future of housing for dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 103: 5759–5772. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17214
  • Gauly, M., Bollwein, H., Breves, G., Brügemann, K., Dänicke, S., Das, G., Demeler, J., Hansen, H., Isselstein, J., König, S., Lohölte, M., Martinsohn, M., Meyer, U., Potthoff, M., Sanker, C., Schröder, B., Wrage, N., Meibaum, B., von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G., Stinshoff, H., Wrenzycki, C. (2013): Future consequences and challenges for dairy cow production systems arising from climate change in Central Europe – a review. Animal 7: 843–859. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112002352
  • Grelet, C., Dardenne, P., Soyeurt, H., Fernandez, J. A., Vanlierde, A., Stevens, F., Gengler, N., Dehareng, F. (2021): Large-scale phenotyping in dairy sector using milk MIR spectra: Key factors affecting the quality of predictions. Methods 186: 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.07.012
  • Herlin, A., Brunberg, E., Hultgren, J., Högberg, N., Rydberg, A., Skarin, A. (2021): Animal welfare implications of digital tools for monitoring and management of cattle and sheep on pasture. Animals 11: 829. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030829
  • Hohmann, L. G., Yin, T., Schweizer, H. Giambra, I. J., König, S., Scholz, A. M. (2021): Comparative effects of milk containing A1 versus A2 – casein on health, growth and -casomorphin-7 level in plasma of neonatal dairy calves. Animals 11: 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010055
  • Jenssen, H. (2009): Antimicrobial activity of lactoferrin and lactoferrin derived peptides. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. New York. ISBN-10: 1606925180.
  • König, S., May, K. (2019): Invited review: Phenotyping strategies and quantitative-genetic background of resistance, tolerance and resilience associated traits in dairy cattle. Animal 13: 897–908. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118003208
  • Luy, X., Li, X., Dang D., Dou, H., Wang, K., Lou, A. (2002): Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) remote sensing in grassland ecosystem monitoring: A systematic review. Remote Sens, 14: 1096. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14051096
  • May, K., Scheper, C., Brügemann, K., Yin, T., Strube, C., Korkuć, P., Brockmann, G. A., König, S. (2019): Genome-wide associations and functional gene analyses for endoparasite resistance in an endangered population of native German Black Pied cattle. BMC Genom. 20: 277. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5659-4
  • Nyamuryekung’e, S., Cibils, A. F., Estell, R. E., Gonzalez, A. L. (2016): Use of an unmanned aerial vehicle—Mounted video camera to assess feeding behavior of Raramuri Criollo cows. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 69: 386–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2016.04.005
  • Ranzato, G, Lora, I., Aernouts, B., Adriaens, I., Gottardo, F., Cozzi, G. (2023): Sensor-based behavioral patterns can identify heat-sensitive lactating dairy cows. Int. J. Biomet. 67: 2047–2054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-023-02561-w
  • Rinaldi, L., Krücken, J., Martinez-Valladares, M., Pepe, P., Maurelli, M. P., de Queiroz, C., Castilla Gómez de Agüero, V., Wang, T., Cringoli, G., Charlier, J., Gilleard, J. S., von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G. (2022): Advances in diagnosis of gastrointestinal nematodes in livestock and companion animals. Adv. Parasitol.: 118: 85–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2022.07.002
  • Takeuchi-Storm, N., Thamsborg, S. M., Enemark, H. L., Boes, J., Williams, D., Denwood, M. J. (2021): Association between milk yield and milk anti-Fasciola hepatica antibody levels, and the utility of bulk tank milk samples for assessing within-herd prevalence on organic dairy farms. Vet. Parasitol. 291: 109374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2021.109374
  • Vercruysse, J., Charlier, J., Van Dijk, J., Morgan, E. R., Geary, T, von Samson Himmelstjerna, G., Claerebout, E. (2018): Control of helminth ruminant infections by 2030. Parasitol. 145: 1655–1664. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003118201700227X.
  • Webb, P., Mehlhorn, S. A., Smartt, P. (2017): Developing protocols for using a UAV to monitor herd health. In Proceedings of the 2017 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Spokane, WA, USA, 16–19.
  • Weinrich, R., Kühl, S., Zühlsdorf, A., Spiller, A. (2014): Consumer attitudes in Germany towards different dairy housing systems and their implications for the marketing of pasture raised milk. IFAMA 17: 205–222.
  • Werner, J., Leso, L., Umstatter, C., Niederhauser, J., Kennedy, E., Geoghegan, A., Shalloo, L., Schick, M., O’Brien, B. (2018): Evaluation of the RumiWatchSystem for measuring grazing behaviour of cows. J. Neurosci. Methods 300: 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neumeth.2017.08.022

Back to top